Micheal Foucault’s writing about disciplinary houses show
how their methods affect the human being to alter their way of thinking, their
responsibility and role within society. Before modern society, houses of
correction emerged to decrease unemployment and idleness. The asylum was born
and began the trend of other disciplines developing their own houses to
legitimise their practice i.e. the hospital.
Patients and inmates were subject to new forms of
discipline. One method was to put an inmate under constant surveillance to make
sure they began to act according to societal rules. Foucault’s ideal methods of
discipline maintain the idea that a human being is acting properly when he is
being his most useful. This can be achieved by observing him constantly which
inadvertently controls his actions and improves his skills and behaviour.
Jeremy Bentham designed the panopticon in 1791. The
panopticon is a housing design that allows scrutiny over anyone with the aim to
experiment and reform it’s subjects. It’s design can be applied throughout
society such as schools, hospitals and working offices to achieve a high level
of productivity.
Foucault suggests that a transformation is occurring within
western societies from a form of power imposed by a single ruler to a new form
of power called panopticism. Panopticism produces self-monitoring societies
that can maintain a level of productivity and obedience by themselves.
Foucault’s states that power is not a thing people have, it
is a relation between individuals and groups and can only exist if it is being
exercised. Disciplinary power relies on the capacity of resistance.
No comments:
Post a Comment